Blaming things on DNA is so 1990’s.
You’re going to need a better excuse.
In church work and leadership, it’s still a big thing to talk about identifying your church’s DNA. Of course DNA is a metaphor in this case. We use this metaphor we we talk about a congregation’s origin story and significant points in that story that define it or limit it for the rest of the life of the congregation.
For instance, in the late ’90s, I pastored a church that had moved to its current location in 1925. For the ensuing 75 years, this congregation perceived itself as a church that struggles financially. It makes a lot of sense for a church, which relocated and built just 4 years before the Great Depression, to come to understand itself in such a way.
This insight is helpful. Defining as DNA, however, might not be.
Way back in the 80’s, when I was in college, all the psychology classes included some time for discussion on the “nature v nurture” debate. What caused or most contributed to a person’s behavior, attitude, intelligence: the intangibles (DNA) one was born with, or the environment in which one was raised?
The answer was always some combination of the two, but we were pretty sure of one thing,: that DNA held deterministic power over the “nature” side of the argument.
But what we knew and what we know are always in a dance together, and this dance has changed.
Sure, genetics, or DNA sets some baselines, or some expectations. But we now know that genes can be turned on and off during one’s lifetime. My favorite study – maybe because it is the only one of which I know any particulars. In a long-term study, rhesus monkies genetically prone to anxiety, when raised by non-anxious, ‘super-nurturing’ parents, had the gene indicating for anxiety turned off.
The DNA of the anxious monkeys didn’t condemn them to lives of anxiety. In fact, the expression of the DNA was changed by nurture.
Takeaway: You are not enslaved by your genes. I believe this is especially true for any of those settings where DNA is used as a metaphor. It can be helpful in understanding some of the primal forces that brought you, or the institution, or organization, to where you are today, but there is no good reason to let it limit or determine the paths who walk from this day forward.
So: “What’s in your DNA?” might be a good conversation starter, but it is not a conversation ender nor is it more ammunition for blame games or excuse making.